The short version
- If you were hurt by a drunk driver, two cases exist and they are not the same case: the State's criminal prosecution, and your civil claim.
- They use different standards. The criminal case must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; your claim is decided on the balance of the evidence — which is why an acquittal does not end it.
- Restitution in the criminal case is not compensation. It is ordered by the criminal court, is usually limited, and does not settle your civil claim.
- A criminal case can outlast your civil deadline. Two years under § 16.003(a) runs regardless of whether the prosecution has finished.
- Where conduct is intoxication assault or intoxication manslaughter, the statutory cap on exemplary damages does not apply (§ 41.008(c)(14)–(15)).
The criminal case and your claim are different things
| Criminal prosecution | Your civil claim | |
|---|---|---|
| Who brings it | The State of Texas | You |
| Standard of proof | Beyond a reasonable doubt | The balance of the evidence |
| What it produces | Punishment — fine, probation, prison | Money damages for your loss |
| Your role | Witness; the case is not yours to control | Party; the case is yours |
| Deadline | Governed by criminal limitations, not yours | Two years from accrual (§ 16.003(a)) |
| Effect of an acquittal | Ends the prosecution | Does not end your claim |
This is why waiting for the criminal case to finish before pursuing the civil claim is one of the most expensive mistakes a victim can make — the two clocks run independently.
Deadlines that can end this claim
| Situation | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Most injury lawsuits | Two years from the day the cause of action accrues. | Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(a) |
| An injury that causes death | Two years, running from the date of death. | Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(b) |
| A City of Houston, Harris County, METRO or state vehicle | Written notice to the governmental unit not later than six months after the incident, describing the injury, the time and place, and the incident — and a city charter can require it sooner. | Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 101.101 |
| Reporting the crash itself | Immediately, by the quickest means of communication, if anyone was injured or killed or a vehicle cannot be driven normally and safely. | Tex. Transp. Code § 550.026(a) |
| If you were partly at fault | No deadline, but a hard bar: a claimant may not recover if their percentage of responsibility is greater than 50 percent. | Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.001 |
Questions people ask after a Houston crash
Tap a question to open it.
Who is prosecuting the driver, and are they my lawyer?
The State of Texas prosecutes, through the Harris County District Attorney's Office, and the prosecutor is not your lawyer. Their client is the State, their objective is a conviction and a sentence, and the decisions about charging, plea bargaining and dismissal belong to them rather than to you. Victims have rights to be informed and heard, and a victim assistance coordinator can help you exercise them, but nobody in the criminal courthouse is representing your financial interests. Your civil claim is the proceeding where your losses are the subject rather than the background.
What is restitution and is it the same as compensation?
It is not. Restitution is an amount a criminal court may order a defendant to pay as part of a sentence, and it is typically limited to certain quantifiable losses, dependent on the defendant's ability to pay, and collected over time through the criminal justice system. It does not account for future medical care, lost earning capacity, or the non-economic harm that usually makes up the larger part of a serious injury claim. A restitution order does not resolve your civil claim, though any amount actually received may be accounted for in the final reckoning.
What happens to my claim if the driver is acquitted or charges are dropped?
Your claim continues. The criminal case must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and prosecutions fail for reasons unconnected to civil liability — a suppression ruling on how a blood sample was obtained, a witness who becomes unavailable, a charging decision made for resource reasons. Your claim asks a different question to a lower standard: whether the driver's negligence caused your injury. Evidence excluded from a criminal trial may still be available to you, and the claim can proceed on ordinary negligence even if intoxication itself is disputed.
What if the driver is convicted — does that win my case?
It helps considerably and it does not do the whole job. A conviction is powerful evidence and it removes most argument about the driver's conduct. But you still have to prove that the collision caused your specific injuries and what those injuries are worth, which is a medical and economic question the criminal court never addressed. It also does not create insurance where none exists. So a conviction changes the liability conversation and leaves the damages conversation entirely intact.
Where does the criminal case happen and can I attend?
In the Harris County criminal courts, separately from any civil matter, which is heard in the civil courts at 201 Caroline Street. You can generally attend proceedings, and Texas recognises rights for crime victims including being informed of proceedings and being heard at sentencing. What you cannot do is direct the prosecution or require a particular outcome. Attending is often valuable for understanding what happened, but it is worth knowing in advance that the questions asked there are not the questions your own claim turns on.
When does my deadline run out if the prosecution is still going?
On the ordinary schedule, regardless. Section 16.003(a) gives two years from the day the cause of action accrues, and § 16.003(b) gives two years from the date of death where the injury proves fatal. Nothing about a pending prosecution pauses that. Criminal cases involving serious injury routinely take longer than two years to resolve, so a victim who waits for the verdict can find the civil deadline has already passed. The civil claim is filed on its own timetable and can then proceed alongside.
When should I speak to the prosecutor about my losses?
Early, and keep your own records regardless. Prosecutors gather victim impact information and losses for restitution purposes, and providing it accurately is worthwhile. But treat that as a parallel process rather than as your damages case: the documentation a criminal court needs for restitution is narrower than what a civil claim requires, and the two are assembled differently. Keep every bill, every explanation of benefits and every record of lost work, because you will need the complete set for the claim whether or not restitution is ordered.
Why do exemplary damages matter more in a DWI case than elsewhere?
Because of a specific statutory carve-out. Exemplary damages generally require clear and convincing evidence of fraud, malice or gross negligence under § 41.003(a), and they are capped by § 41.008(b) at the greater of twice economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000, or $200,000. But § 41.008(c) disapplies that cap for conduct described as a felony under Penal Code § 49.07, intoxication assault, and § 49.08, intoxication manslaughter — and for those two the section does not require the conduct to have been knowing or intentional.
Why is the driver's insurance often not enough?
Because Texas requires only $30,000 per person and $60,000 per crash under § 601.072, and DWI collisions tend to produce injuries well past that. Some policies also contain provisions relevant to intoxicated operation. That is why the other avenues matter: a dram shop claim against an establishment that over-served, an employer if the driver was working, and your own uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage, which Texas requires insurers to provide unless a named insured rejected it in writing under § 1952.101(b).
How do the two cases actually interact in practice?
The criminal case can be a useful source of evidence and an obstacle to timing. Its investigation produces the blood or breath analysis, body-camera footage, witness statements and the officer's findings — material that may become available to your claim. At the same time, a defendant facing prosecution will often decline to testify in the civil case while charges are pending, which can slow discovery. Managing that sequencing is part of the work, and it is another reason to start the civil claim rather than wait for the criminal one to end.
4.9 out of 5 from 360 Google reviews. Read them on Google.
★★★★★
Hi, I would recommend their services they were very helpful in handling and resolving my case. I received great medical care on their behalf and I was taken care of as a client by Mr. Gabriel he went above and beyond to ensure I didn't settle for less than I was owed.
★★★★★
Maida law firm was great. They have amazing communication. The staff was also very friendly and professional. The process was fast and they are very reliable. I will definitely be recommending them to all my friends and family. Thank you so much Maida Law Firm.
Reviews are the opinions of the clients who wrote them. Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case.
Recent Houston-area crashes of this kind
These are reported incidents from July 2026 onward, linked to the outlet that covered them. We were not involved in these cases and describe them only as published.
- Driver charged with intoxication manslaughter after a Southwest Freeway crash ABC13 / KTRK, July 2026
- Felony DWI charge after a northwest Harris County crash kills a child passenger ABC13 / KTRK, August 2026
Related Houston claims we handle
Where we are in Houston
Maida Law Firm
8313 Southwest Fwy Ste 102, Houston, TX 77074
We are on the Southwest Freeway, minutes from the 610 Loop and Sharpstown, and we see clients from across Harris County.
About the authors

Sam A. Maida, Jr.
Owner and Managing Attorney
Sam A. Maida, Jr. has represented injured Texans in the greater Houston area since the firm opened in 1993.
State Bar of TexasAvvoMartindale-HubbellLawLinkThatCarHitMeLinkedIn

Bernard G. Johnson III
Litigation Managing Attorney
Bernard G. Johnson III is a board certified trial lawyer licensed in Texas since 1996 and a graduate of South Texas College of Law.